Your AI Enablement Program

AI workshops and trainings don't work. Rebasing does.

The classroom model is dead, because group averages don't ship code. We coach every engineer at their own level, inside their own codebase, until AI-native is just how they work.

Trusted by teams at

Sopra SteriaCommerzbank DTCHedgeServAccediaOfficeRnDE-Comprocessing
The Problem

The "AI Slop" Trap

Vibe code is AI-generated code produced without structure, tests, or context discipline: unpredictable, unmaintainable, and expensive to clean up. Most teams ship it by default.

More Time Debugging Than Coding

Developers spend more time fixing AI-generated hallucinations than they would have spent writing the code themselves.

Hallucination Rabbit Holes

AI confidently invents non-existent APIs and libraries. Teams chase ghosts for days, completely destroying sprint predictability.

Context Rot

Unstructured AI generation turns your codebase into a black box. No one understands how it works anymore.

How Rebasing Works

A Cognitive Rebase is a structured transformation of how an engineering team thinks about and works with AI: every engineer is profiled, then coached inside their own codebase through three engineering disciplines. We don't just prompt; we engineer.

01

Executable Specs (TDD)

Turning business logic into deterministic anchors that guide AI precisely. The AI writes code to satisfy tests, not the other way around.

02

Context Isolation

Using Hexagonal Design to limit the blast radius of AI changes. Your codebase is structured so agents only need a tiny, relevant slice of context.

03

Small, Verifiable Steps

High-frequency feedback loops to prevent context drift and hallucinations. Microscopic, instantly-verifiable steps AI handles with near 100% accuracy.

Delivery model

Three pillars. One outcome: an AI-native team.

PILLAR 01

Team-wide onboarding

Every engineer starts on the same page, with their context already mapped.

cognitive-rebase.app/diagnose
AI Diagnostic
Personalizes your team's rebase plan
01 / 03
How do you typically start a new feature?
No wrong answer — this tells us where to meet you.
PILLAR 02

Personalized micro-coaching

Clone your leadership, or use our AI avatar coach. Either way, every engineer learns the tracks at their own level.

Context Bankruptcy

LEARNING PATH

The Claude MD Effect

LEARNING PATH

The Productivity Illusion

LEARNING PATH
PILLAR 03

Weekly upskilling reports

You see exactly who is adapting, who is stuck, and where to intervene; every week.

reports/individual
Individual report screenshotTeam Lead report screenshotExecutive report screenshotCohort report screenshot
Mihail Tsvyatkov, CTO of Sopra Steria Bulgaria
Beautifully presenting the holistic way of thinking that needs to be adopted when developing software with AI.
Mihail Tsvyatkov CTO, Sopra Steria Bulgaria
WHO THIS IS FOR

Not for everyone.

Segment 01

IT Services &
Nearshore Teams

Your clients are already asking if your team is AI-ready. Now you can prove it, with engineers who ship AI-augmented code that holds up to enterprise review.

Segment 02

FinTech / Banking
Tech Centers

AI-generated code in regulated systems has to be deterministic and auditable. Ours is, and we'll teach your team to keep it that way.

If your team ships code that touches production,
and AI is part of the workflow,
→ we should talk.

OUR BELIEFS

Two things most won't say out loud.

BELIEF 00

Individual contributors should not be reading code anymore.

The engineers who will define the next decade are the ones directing AI; not the ones debugging what it wrote.

BELIEF 01

CTOs should not leave their teams to natural selection.

Some engineers will adapt. Most won't; not without structure, visibility, and a deliberate path forward. That's your job to provide.

See the Method in Action

Short clips from live sessions; real methodology, no fluff.

TDD: The Cornerstone of AI Development

WEBINAR CLIP

Spec-Driven Development with Executable Tests

WEBINAR CLIP

Stop Reviewing AI Code, Focus on Architecture

WEBINAR CLIP

Small Steps Prevent Errors & Speed Feedback

WEBINAR CLIP
Who Delivers This

Practitioners, Not Theorists

They've trained engineering teams on disciplined AI development across European time zones.

Tsvetan Tsvetanov

Tsvetan Tsvetanov

Co-Owner @ Camplight

Product-oriented software engineer with 12 years of experience. AI-Native engineer who continuously refines systems and principles for software development without writing code manually. Has worked on enterprise search systems and large-scale microservice architectures powering transit systems in major cities.

LinkedIn
Martin Martinov

Martin Martinov

Co-Owner @ Camplight

Programming since 1996 on 8-bit machines, giving him perspective across the entire technological evolution up to modern Kubernetes architectures. Sees legacy systems as foundations to build on, not burdens. A pragmatist over hype, with experience in critical sectors like healthcare and finance. Helps teams deploy intelligent automation that reliably takes over routine work.

LinkedIn

🇧🇬 Based in Bulgaria. Delivered in English or Bulgarian. 🇬🇧

FINANCIAL IMPACT

The Cost of AI Slop

Calculate how much undisciplined AI usage is costing your engineering team annually.

5 developers
8 hrs
WORKING WEEKS = 48/yr
DEBUG TIME ≈ 23–25% of work week (Sonar State of Code 2026)
CLAUDE OPUS OUTPUT = ~150K tokens/hr
OPUS PRICE = ~€14/M output tokens

Adjust the sliders, then unlock your estimate

Engagement Models

Choose the depth of transformation your team needs.

QUESTIONS & ANSWERS

Frequently Asked Questions

Everything you need to know about Cognitive Rebase and working with us.

Methodology & Technicals

Engagement & Delivery

Logistics & Pricing

Book a 30-Minute Fit Call

A quick, no-pressure chat to see if we're the right fit for your team.